A generated summary or image can be presented in a way that makes its origin difficult to recognize. Readers may assume it is a direct record or an independently checked explanation.
Use a description that fits the role of the output. Distinguish a draft, an illustrative image, and a verified result. If a person revised or checked the material, explain that work accurately rather than making a vague claim about review.
Place the context where it will be encountered with the content. A useful label should help the reader understand what the piece can support, including any important uncertainty. It is part of the explanation rather than a separate decorative badge.
Bring the idea into a day.
Imagine a suggested paragraph labeled as a draft and accompanied by the supplied notes. A reader can see both its origin and its unfinished status.
Another angle on the story.
Keep the origin of a claim close to the claim itself. A generated explanation and an independently checked source play different roles in understanding a result.
- Describe the output’s actual role.
- State review work accurately.
- Keep production context near the content.
Follow a related question
Choose the details that distinguish your files.
Filenames that carry contextDefine the shared starting condition.
Compare groups that share a startKeep learning
Related background to continue exploring this subject.
NIST: AI risk management framework Google: prompt design strategies